Showing posts with label Academia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Academia. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 January 2026

Focus and Read Without Getting Distracted

Prologue [should have been an epilogue, as I wrote this after the post, but it fits better here]: While this was written with researchers in mind, it is equally applicable to others who feel distracted and find it difficult, challenging even, to sit through a cognitive task. The tricks mentioned are not fully my own; I have picked them from my various readings, but not one specific source. Mostly I enumerate what works for me. Internalize these or any other tricks that may work for you, and you can add to the comments for others to benefit from them.

You sit down to read a research article. The paper PDF is open. Your tea/coffee is hot. For thirty-seven seconds, there is peace. You hit the first citation and turn to the references section to check it.  Thereafter, an itch to check that author’s other citations takes you to another tab.  Then it starts: a buzz of social media notifications in your pocket. IMDB ratings for the current Hollywood/Bollywood blockbuster. A sudden, critical need to know the AQI in Delhi-NCR. Sound familiar? You are not alone !

After 15 minutes, you realize you are not reading. You are performing a ritual of attempted focus, haunted by your wavering attention. This appears like personal failure, but I think mostly it is systematic hijacking.

When we were kids, we were told to get disciplined and “Just focus.” Now it's not possible anymore in the digital age and is akin to surfing in high tides. Our brain has two powerful ingrained systems, to decide what to do:

1. Novelty Seeker: Drawn to novelty. A new tab, a new email, a new idea, a new reference. It promises a dopamine hit, a tiny reward for discovering something new.

2. The Sustainer: The quiet, deep-work discipline that wants to follow a single thread to its logical conclusion.

(Daniel Kahneman- Thinking fast and slow)

The modern digital world is a never-ending, constant stream of a never-stopping roller-coaster ride in your pocket, a browser with infinite tabs, which is a paradise built for the Seeker. But it is also responsible for starving out the Sustainer. Your research, your deep work, requires the Sustainer. Unfortunately, you are trying to meditate in a fireworks factory. As soon as you try to focus on something, the fear of missing out (FOMO) hits you hard, and like a drug addict, you open social media feed or a new chrome tab.

The Digital Grief (aka the FOMO) makes you lazy: This is not real laziness but digital grief. Your linearity (focus) drives you through complex tasks but is dead now. You had it before the unending feeds, alerts took you over.

You can’t read a paper because reading the paper is no longer just that task. It is resisting the urge to google the co-author’s biography mid-sentence. It’s fighting the impulse to dive into a ten-tab rabbit hole about a tangential methodology. The paper ceases to be just a document; it is a battlefield with a constant barrage of ever-pointy arrowheads, baying for your attention.

Your attention is fractured into a thousand tiny pieces, each reflecting a different, incomplete piece of the world. While it's easy to feel stupid, but you’re just overwhelmed.

How to Reset: Some Uncomfortable Truths

Fixing this cannot come from new apps. Let's just accept the three truths:

1. Willpower is a Non-Renewable Resource

Every novelty unattended (i.e., notifications you ignore, every itch to browse you resist) will drain the energy tank you have, no matter how big. Before you know it, you’re running on fumes. So, instead of fighting distractions as they happen, it is more effective if these are treated before they happen. In other words, declare war at the source. Before you sit down:

  • Phone: Airplane mode or in another room.
  • Browser: Use a brutal blocker for complete freedom. Block everything except the journal site for 90 minutes. This is not a suggestion. Use it as a law.
  • Environment: Face a wall, not a window. The world is too interesting right now.

2. Re-learn Boredom

When our brains have forgotten how to be bored, they keep screaming for stimulus and novelty. Even in the two-second lull between sentences, it now screams for stimulus. Friends/dates are glued to their smartphones in between conversations and restaurant lunch/dinner. We must retrain it.

The 90-Minute Corpse: If you set a timer for 90 minutes, assume you are dead to the world. You may only read this PDF/paper or write in the document. The itch to do anything else will feel physical, a panic even. Sit with it. Let it scream. Know that it will pass. You are teaching your Seeker that this time is a barren, reward-less place. It will eventually stop shouting.

3. You Are Recovering/Curing an Addiction

This is the hardest truth pill to swallow. The constant switch between tasks, the quick hits of new information is a well known (but never acknowledged) addiction. The recovery path is daily, humble, and non-negotiable.

  • The First Page is a Mountain: Don’t commit to reading the full paper. Commit to reading the abstract. Then the first paragraph. Trick your brain into starting. Build momentum since momentum is the only cure for the initial resistance.
  • Print It Out. Without thinking twice, do this. The tactile nature of paper, the inability to click away creates the much needed cage for your focus.

The fight is no longer to be knowledgeable, but to be able to build a cell of quiet in a screaming world. Your value is no longer in how much you can process, but in how deeply you can ignore.

By doing this, you are not simply trying to focus but trying to become a human being again. Close this tab. Open a PDF. And stare at it until your mind, kicking and screaming, finally comes home.

Thursday, 16 January 2014

Stages of a PhD progression

This is a fun take on how PhD progression occurs, mainly in Indian context (more specifically my grad institute), but I presume similarities may occur worldwide. This is in context of giving your ideas or discussing/arguing/contesting what the mentor suggests. (Take it with a pinch of salt).

Generally, it is 5 year duration here- mentors won't allow 4 years easily nor would you be able to complete the work in that time. Sometimes, even 6 or 7 years can pass by without you noticing.

So here are the Stages of the PhD progression-

1st year - You are naive and don't know what is good or not (scientific project wise). You work on all ideas of mentor even if they are trash. You don't know when to speak up.

2nd year- You have started to feel you should speak up against some of the (silly) ideas but don't know when. And whenever you do, you get trashed.

3rd year- Having had enough of side tracks, you get bold and start speaking at (against?) all (almost) ideas the boss suggests. Not knowing when to say what, you always argue (not good for getting a PhD in the long run).

4th year- You develop tact and know when to say what but its too late, the damage has been done last year. Now that you want a PhD, you try to play ball using the new found wisdom to just get it done. Adviser also realizes this and never fails to mention you need to do XYZ before you can graduate.

5th year- Both of you understand each other like husband and wife. No pretenses work. Conversations are less animated and most talking is done by body language only. Both are in "you don't kill me I won't kill you" mode. Mentor is sharp enough to know you can't take that risk anyway. Tries to get done a few things you were always avoiding but now can't refuse.

6th and 7th year- You are still here? Either you haven't seen it coming or(bad planning/tough project) or your mentor is plain greedy. Why hire a post doc when you can get the work done through a miserable student who will do anything to get a PhD. You think I don't have an idea what to do next, let's get anything done to graduate. You do almost everything you are asked of, and arguments are as much as in 1st year again.